Showing posts with label more cats? calm down sean. Show all posts
Showing posts with label more cats? calm down sean. Show all posts

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Assisted Dying

Here are a few links on euthanasia:
VERY Active Euthanasia

Monday, April 25, 2011

Persennhood

Here are some links related to our ongoing discussion of the the moral status of persons:
Obligatory 42 Reference

Friday, April 22, 2011

Abortion

Here are some links related to our class discussions on the ethics of abortion:
Listen to Classical Music If You Want to SEEM Smart

Friday, April 15, 2011

Extra Credit: Buchanan's Article

Here is the extra credit assignment on the Allen Buchanan article (pgs. 525-529) that I mentioned at the end of class this week.  Answer each of these three questions:
1. How does Buchanan define a “moral right” to a decent minimum of health care? (pg. 526)  Explain his definition in your own words.
2. In your own words, explain the reasons Buchanan gives for thinking that:
-many current U.S. citizens deserve access to basic health care (3 reasons on pg. 527); and
-the U.S. government should require all citizens to contribute to our health system. (pgs. 528-29)
3. In one sentence, summarize the main point (conclusion) of Buchanan’s article.
This is due at the beginning of class on Wednesday, April 20th. 

A LolDog Will Do When a LolCat Isn't Available

Saturday, April 9, 2011

The Wisdom of Kass

The Leon Kass reading on cloning that we studied in class was part of a longer article that is available in its entirety here.

Many critics take issue with Kass's claim that there is a wisdom to repugnance.  Here is a typical objection to Kass's view:
"Anyone who as ever taken an introductory anthropology course, or read Herodotus -- or gone to a different part of town -- will have learned that different groups feel disgust at different things. The affect seems to be hard-wired into us, but the occasions provoking it are varied.
...
"In short, disgust is not quite so unambiguous and inarguable an expression of timeless values as [Kass] has advertised. Given a choice between 'deep wisdom' and 'reason’s power fully to articulate,' we might do best to leave the ineffable to Oprah."
Moral psychologist Jonathan Haidt argues that one big difference between politically conservative and liberal people is the willingness to consider disgust as a morally relevant factor.  Here's his TED talk on this:

What do you think?  Feel free to let us know in the comments of this post.

LolCats Have Deep, Ineffable Wisdom

Thursday, April 7, 2011

Clone Wars

Here are some links on cloning:
Multiplicity

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Health Care Readings

In case you weren't there, here are links to the two articles I handed out in class tonight as assigned reading for next week's discussion about the economics of health care:
  1. U.S. Health Care Reform
  2. G.O.P. Blueprint Would Remake Health Policy
PolitiCat Gets Political

Sunday, April 3, 2011

Owning Our Ignorance

Owning Our Microphones
I advise the Owning Our Ignorance club here at CCC.  We have a lot of nerdy discussions, host movie nights, and do other stuff in pursuit of getting better at learning.  If you join our Facebook group, you'll be automatically invited to all our events. 

Our big project this semester is creating a radio show.  Well, the first episode of the Owning Our Ignorance Show airs this Tuesday at 9:00 a.m. on WDBK, the college radio station.  Tune in to 91.5 FM to hear Calvin, Destiny, Jordan, and Rachel discuss the role that humility plays in effective reasoning.

If you like the show, you can subscribe to the podcast here (or via iTunes).  Upcoming show topics include the following:
  • the most important questions
  • good vs. bad skepticism
  • persuasion
  • happiness
  • art
  • prejudice
  • Ayn Rand
  • our top 5 to learn lists 
  • cognitive biases
Cats Always Hit the Post

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Term Paper Guideline

Due Date: at the beginning of class on Wednesday, May 11th, 2011

Worth: 30% of your final grade

Assignment: Write an argumentative essay on the topic below. Papers must be typed, and must be between 600-1200 words long. Provide a word count on the first page of the paper. (Most programs like Microsoft Word have automatic word counts.)

Topic: Explain and defend your definition of person as it relates to morality, and specifically to the ethics of stem-cell research, abortion, and impaired infants.
(1) First, briefly explain and critically evaluate the different definitions of “person” that we have discussed in class. Be sure to explain each definition offered by the President’s Council on Bioethics, Michael Sandel, Mary Anne Warren, Tristram Engelhardt, and John Robertson.

(2) Second, explain how each of the following authors uses the concept of “person” to attempt to settle the particular ethical debate she or he wrote about (The President’s Bioethics Council and Sandel on stem-cell research; Warren and Marquis on abortion; and Engelhardt and Robertson on impaired infants).
[NOTE: Some of these authors think personhood is irrelevant to their issue.]

(3) Third, explain and defend your own definition of “person”: do you agree with one of these authors’ definitions, or do you have one of your own?

(4) Fourth, explain the solution your definition of “person” gives to the ethics of stem-cell research, abortion, and impaired infants.
When considering your definition of person, be sure to consider and answer the following questions: Which living entities are persons, and which living entities are not persons? Do you believe one needs to be a person in the moral sense in order to be worthy of moral consideration (for instance, do some non-persons have a right to not be killed and a right to not suffer unnecessarily)? Do persons have special moral significance? Can someone have moral rights before they have moral duties? Be sure to fully explain and philosophically defend each of your answers.

Does Rights  Entail Responsbilities?

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Revised Schedule

Based on our discussion in class on March 9th and our efforts to closely match the old schedule from your prior professor, here is our tentative schedule for the rest of the semester:

March 23: Race & Gender

-Susan Sherwin (pgs. 253-258) ← sample consensus session
-Annette Dula (pgs. 258-264) ← in class informal group work
-optional: (pgs. 211-214, 223-227)

March 30: Embryonic Stem Cells & Genetic Control
-President’s Council on Bioethics (pgs. 312-316)
-Pontifical Academy (pgs. 316-317)
-Michael Sandel (pgs. 318-319) ← in class informal group work
-optional: (pgs. 270-288)
-Jeff McMahan (pgs. 333-337)
-Dena Davis (pgs. 337-346) ← group presentation 4

April 6: Reproductive Control, Cloning, & Scarce Medical Resources
-Gillian Hanscombe (pgs. 406-409) ← group presentation 5
-Leon Kass (pgs. 438-443)
-Carson Strong (pgs. 443-447) ← in class informal group work
-George Annas (pgs. 500-504) ← group presentation 6
-optional: (pgs. 377-383, 457-462)

April 13: The Economics of Health Care
-TEST (on ethical theories, race & gender, stem cells, genetic control, reproductive control, cloning, & medical resources)
-New York Times synopsis of U.S. Healthcare Reform (handout)
-Allen Buchanan (pgs. 525-529) ← in class informal group work
-William Custer, Charles Kahn, & Thomas Wildsmith (pgs. 534-536) ← group presentation 7
-Paul Krugman (pgs. 533-534)
-optional: (pgs. 512-519)

April 20: Abortion
-Mary Anne Warren (pgs. 586-594) ← in class informal group work
-Don Marquis (pgs. 594-598) ← group presentation 8
-optional: (pgs. 546-559)

April 27: Impaired Infants
-Tristram Engelhardt (pgs. 646-650)
-John Robertson (pgs. 639-645) ← group presentation 9
-Robert Weir (pgs. 651-657) ← in class informal group work
-optional: (pgs. 624-630)

May 4: Euthanasia
-Daniel Callahan (pgs. 706-711) ← group presentation 10
-Daniel E. Lee (pgs. 722-725)
-James Rachels (pgs. 725-729) ← in class informal group work
-Winston Nesbitt (pgs. 729-732)
-optional: (pgs. 682-689)
-review for Final Exam

May 11: Final Exam
-TERM PAPER DUE
-FINAL EXAM
It's Starting to Look Like a Triple Rainbow!

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Email Subscription

So why does this course have a blog? Well, why is anything anything?

A blog (short for “web log”) is a website that works like a journal – users write posts that are sorted by date based on when they were written. You can find important course information (like assignments, due dates, reading schedules, etc.) on the blog. I’ll also be updating the blog throughout the semester, posting interesting items related to the stuff we’re currently discussing in class. You don't have to visit the blog if you don't want to. It's just a helpful resource. I've used a blog for this course a lot, and it's seemed helpful. Hopefully it can benefit our course, too.

Since I’ll be updating the blog a lot throughout the semester, you should check it frequently. There are, however, some convenient ways to do this without simply going to the blog each day. The best way to do this is by getting an email subscription, so any new blog post I write automatically gets emailed to you. (You can also subscribe to the rss feed, if you know what that means.) To get an email subscription:

1. Go t0 http://cccbioethics11.blogspot.com.

2. At the main page, enter your email address at the top of the right column (under “EMAIL SUBSCRIPTION: Enter your Email”) and click the "Subscribe me!" button.

3. This will take you to a new page. Follow the directions under #2, where it says “To help stop spam, please type the text here that you see in the image below. Visually impaired or blind users should contact support by email.” Once you type the text, click the "Subscribe me!" button again.

4. You'll then get an email regarding the blog subscription. (Check your spam folder if you haven’t received an email after a day.) You have to confirm your registration. Do so by clicking on the "Click here to activate your account" link in the email you receive.

5. This will bring you to a page that says "Your subscription is confirmed!" Now you're subscribed.

If you are unsure whether you've subscribed, ask me (609-980-8367; slandis@camdencc.edu). I can check who's subscribed and who hasn't.

Laptop Kitty

Monday, March 7, 2011

Course Details

Camden County College, Blackwood Campus
Philosophy 232
Spring 2011 
Section 51: Wednesdays, 5:20 – 7:50 p.m. in Madison 110
Section 53: Wednesdays, 8:00 – 10:30 p.m. in Madison 111

Instructor: Sean Landis
Email: slandis@camdencc.edu
Phone: 609-980-8367
Course Website: http://cccbioethics11.blogspot.com
Office Hourse: by appointment

Required Text

Intervention and Reflection: Basic Issues in Medial Ethics, 8th Edition, by Ronald Munson

About the Course
This course is designed to introduce students to philosophical thinking and some specific ethical concerns unique to the medical community. During the course, we will be studying particular moral problems that face people in the biomedical professions. Topics include abortion, stem-cell research, genetic control, euthanasia, our treatment of animals, the economics of health care, race and gender, and truth telling.

We will also be developing various philosophical skills, including:
  • Understanding: the ability to identify and explain an author’s main point in your own words, along with the ability to identify and explain an author’s argument in support of this main point.
  • Evaluating: the ability to critically and charitably determine whether these arguments provide accurate, logical reasons in support of their main points, along with the ability to engage in critical and charitable dialogue with people who hold different views from your own.
  • Defending: the ability to develop your own arguments in support of your opinions on the ethical issues we study, along with the ability to honestly assess your opinions and critically evaluate the quality of your arguments in support of them.
A broader goal of this course is to gain an appreciation for philosophical reflection. Hopefully, we will learn that careful, deliberate examination of the ethical assumptions we often take for granted can improve our own approach to morality, and make us better in our anticipated roles in the medical community.


T-Rex Asks the Big Questions

Grades
90%-100%= A
80%-89.9% = B
70%-79.9% = C
60%-69.9% = D
below 60% = F

Test: 15%
Final Exam: 25%
Term Paper: 30%
Group Presentation (Consensus Session): 20%
Attendance/Participation: 10% total

Already Existing Grades from Assignments in the First 7 Weeks of Class: On March 9th, we will be discussing how to handle these grades.

Test: The test is scheduled for the first hour of class on April 13th. It will be on the topics that we cover in the 4 weeks leading up to April 13th (currently, this means the ethical theories of utilitarianism, Kant’s ethics, and Aristotle’s virtue ethics; abortion; stem cells & genetic control; and euthanasia).

Final Exam: The final exam is scheduled for May 11th. This exam is cumulative; that is, it will cover everything we study during our 8 weeks together.

Group Presentation (Consensus Session): This will be an in-class, group oral presentation. During the semester, we will be going over specific ethical debates. Each group of around 3 to 5 students will be assigned to present a short lesson on one of the articles we’re reading for class, and lead a class-wide discussion on the issue being debated.

Term Paper: This will be an essay in which you explain and defend your opinion on some of the applied ethical issues we’re studying.

Attendance/Participation: A lot of this will be based on your attendance. If you’re there every class, you’ll get full credit for the attendance portion of this grade. Also, there will be a lot of informal group work throughout the semester. Group work can impact this grade.

Extra Credit: I like giving extra credit! I’ll be giving some official extra credit assignments throughout the semester. I’ll also be offering some extra credit points more informally during class time. Try to remind me about this if I slack off on dishing out extra credit assignments.

Classroom Policies
Academic Integrity: Cheating and plagiarism (using someone else’s words or ideas in a paper or assignment without giving credit to the source) will not be tolerated in the class. Students found guilty of either will definitely fail the exam or assignment on which they plagiarize—and possibly the entire class.

Excused Absences: Make-up exams, presentations, and other assignments will only be rescheduled for any excused absences. Excused absences include religious observance, official college business, and illness or injury (with a doctor’s note). An unexcused absence on the day of any assignment or test will result in a zero on that assignment or test.

Ask Me About My Bunny
Disability Accommodations: If you have special requirements let me know as soon as possible so we can make all necessary arrangements.

Important Dates
January 18th: Last day to drop a course & receive a 100% refund.
February 1st: Last day to drop a course & receive a 50% refund.
February 8th: Last day to sign up to audit a course.
April 26th: Last day to withdraw from Spring Classes.

Sunday, March 6, 2011

Course Schedule

*This schedule has changed drastically... see the revised schedule here!

March 9: Intro to Class /Mill, Kant, & Aristotle Review
-Introduction to class (figuring out where we are)
-Utilitarianism (John Stuart Mill) (pgs. 740-750)
-Immanuel Kant’s Ethics (pgs. 750-755)
-Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics (pgs. 782-784)

March 16: No Class
SPRING BREAK (no class)

March 23: Abortion
-Mary Anne Warren (pgs. 586-594) (sample consensus session)
-Don Marquis (pgs. 594-598)
-optional: (pgs. 546-559)
-in class informal group work

March 30th Embryonic Stem Cells & Genetic Control
-President’s Council on Bioethics (pgs. 312-316)
-Pontifical Academy (pgs. 316-317)
-Michael Sandel (pgs. 318-319)
-optional: (pgs. 270-288)
-Jeff McMahan (pgs. 333-337)
-Dena Davis (pgs. 337-346)
-group presentations 1 & 2 
-in class informal group work

April 6: Euthanasia
-Daniel Callahan (pgs. 706-711)
-Daniel E. Lee (pgs. 722-725)
-James Rachels (pgs. 725-729)
-Winston Nesbitt (pgs. 729-732)
-optional: (pgs. 682-689)
-group presentations 3 & 4 

April 13: Animal Research
-TEST (on ethical theories, abortion, stem cells, genetic control, & euthanasia)
-Peter Singer (pgs. 79-86)
-Carl Cohen (pg. 86-92)
-optional: (pgs. 22-24)
-group presentation 5 

April 20: The Economics of Health Care
-New York Times synopsis of U.S. Healthcare Reform (handout)
-Allen Buchanan (pgs. 525-529)
-William Custer, Charles Kahn, & Thomas Wildsmith (pgs. 534-536)
-Paul Krugman (pgs. 533-534)
-optional: (pgs. 512-519)
-group presentations 6 & 7

April 27: Race & Gender
-Susan Sherwin (pgs. 253-258)
-Annette Dula (pgs. 258-264)
-optional: (pgs. 211-214, 223-227)
-group presentations 8 & 9
-in class informal group work

May 4: Truth Telling
-TERM PAPER DUE
-Mack Lipkin (pgs. 152-154)
-Susan Cullen & Margaret Klein (pgs. 154-161)
-optional: (pgs. 102-116)
-group presentations 10 & 11
-review for Final Exam 

May 11: Final Exam
-FINAL EXAM


It's Starting to Look Like a Triple Rainbow!